Enter the password to continue.
Which firms create consumer brands, and how. 50 incubations across 17 firms.
Sorted by number of builds. Click a firm for its brands and outcomes. Structure records whether the firm builds from a fund or from an operating company.
Click any row for founding year, deal type, size, investor count, legal name and notes.
The PitchBook screen covered deals from 18 Aug 2021 to 18 Aug 2026. Rows added from press research carry no date bound and some are older, so the two records do not cover the same period.
Two limits sit on any fund-against-studio comparison. First, the model labels are ours, and the boundary is soft: PitchBook calls Science Inc an incubator and investment firm, AlleyCorp a studio and an early-stage venture capital firm, and types Prehype as Venture Capital plus Accelerator. Placing their exits outside the fund column is a judgement. Second, the search was not symmetric — fund builds before 2021 were not searched, so the recency of the fund builds reflects the screen window rather than when funds began. This data cannot settle which model works better.
42 of 50 rows have no recorded first-financing date and 43 have no recorded investor count. Brand houses own their brands outright, so those brands never raise and no financing exists to record. Any screen built on financing data undercounts this model.
PitchBook cannot identify an incubation. Last Financing Deal Type is a stage field, not an origin field, and it labels a fund build "Early Stage VC" or "Seed Round" and never "Accelerator/Incubator".